Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission backs allowing bus-dispatch facilities with conditional-use permits

Jurupa Valley Planning Commission · July 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Jurupa Valley Planning Commission unanimously recommended city council adopt a zoning code amendment to allow "bus dispatch facilities" in the MSC zone with a required conditional-use permit, adding development standards on fencing, screening, landscaping and minor on-site maintenance.

The Jurupa Valley Planning Commission voted 4–0 to recommend that the City Council adopt a zoning code amendment (MA25123 / ZCA25006) to allow "bus dispatch facilities" in the MSC zone with an approved conditional-use permit.

Staff said the change started after a 2020 code case involving an unpermitted bus-transportation business and the business owner’s later request for a formal code amendment. Associate Planner Oscar Schroeder told the commission the draft ordinance would add a new section defining bus dispatch facilities and set development standards addressing storage, screening, fencing, surfacing, landscaping and maintenance.

Schroeder said the draft was revised after prior Planning Commission feedback so that walls or fences would be required only along project frontages, not necessarily around entire properties; bus storage would have to be screened from public right-of-way rather than required inside a building; unpaved storage areas must use drip pans; and required trees would be 24-inch box specimens rather than 36-inch to reduce upfront costs for small operators. He also said buildings and storage areas would be required to be set back 25 feet from residentially zoned properties, and the code would prohibit decommissioned or inoperative vehicles.

Commissioners asked staff whether security measures, tree spacing and fire-suppression conditions would be handled administratively. Staff replied that fencing and landscaping details would be finalized with landscape architects during permit review and that fire-department conditions would be folded into the CUP and business licensing review.

Sharon Allen, a representative for the applicant (Ms. Starks), told the commission the operator supports flexibility on surfacing — allowing asphalt, concrete, decomposed granite or gravel with drip pans — and asked that requirements be fair to tenants who cannot compel landowners to make improvements.

After discussion, the commission expressed support for the revised standards and for a two-step process (zoning change plus a subsequent CUP). The commission adopted a resolution recommending City Council approve ZCA25006 and found the amendment exempt from CEQA under the general-exemption guideline (Guideline 15061(b)(3)). The motion passed 4–0.

What happens next: the Planning Commission’s resolution and file will be transmitted to the City Council for final action. If the council approves the ordinance, individual bus dispatch operations would still need to apply for and obtain a conditional-use permit and satisfy any fire- or safety-related conditions attached to that permit.