Get email alerts on the Land Use And Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Selectmen note subdivision approval, building permits and current-use/LUCT considerations
Summary
Planning Board approved a two-lot subdivision for Valley View/David Bergeron/Mckenzie; selectmen recorded receipts for subdivision hearing costs and discussed current-use/Land Use Change Tax (LUCT) implications. Building permits (Jason Martin, Heidi Lord) and an Intent to Cut for Kenneth Wright and Chagnon/Russo were placed on upcoming agendas.
Get email alerts on the Land Use And Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Selectmen recorded land-use and permit items discussed at the April 28 meeting.
The Planning Board approved a two-lot subdivision for Valley View associated with David Bergeron and Mckenzie, and the town received check #4821 for $251.56 toward subdivision hearing costs. The minutes also note certified mailing costs of $183.92 to Laura Barrett and a notation of a shared driveway; board members discussed that LUCT will be required when land is removed from current use.
A building permit for Jason Martin was confirmed as still valid. A separate building permit application from Heidi Lord for a woodshed was scheduled for next week's agenda. Intent to Cut notices for Kenneth Wright and for Chagnon/Russo were placed on the next agenda.
Selectmen also discussed a request for lien information for a current-use lien on Map 6 Lot Bergevin; in lieu of an A-10, tax liens had been used historically to establish current-use status, and Bruce Smith was asked to respond to Bradley Law Firm on that matter.
The selectmen appointed Laryssa Hiller to the Planning Board.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
