Get email alerts on the County Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Pendleton County Commission approves routine financial and administrative items
Summary
At its Sept. 2 meeting, the Pendleton County Commission unanimously approved multiple routine motions including a $15,000 sheriff tax collection authorization, the September delinquent tax list, clerk-made appointments, exonerations, and ordered payments from several county funds; the meeting adjourned to Sept. 16.
The Pendleton County Commission on Sept. 2 approved a series of routine financial and administrative items by unanimous vote.
Key votes recorded in the minutes: - Approved the Sheriff’s Commission for tax collections for the fiscal year in the amount of $15,000 (motion by Commissioner Roger Dahmer; unanimous). - Approved the September delinquent taxes list (motion by Commissioner Jimmie Bennett; unanimous). - Approved appointments of administrators, executors and similar actions performed by the County Clerk in vacation of the commission (motion by Commissioner Bennett; unanimous). - Approved listed exonerations for taxpayers and entities (motion by Commissioner Dahmer; unanimous). The minutes list exonerations and amounts by name and district. - Ordered allowances and disbursements from multiple funds with check numbers recorded: General County Fund (Check Nos. 36031–36040, $3,580.58); Coal Severance Fund (Check No. 200311, $300.64); Dog & Kennel Fund (Check Nos. 471–472, $931.68); Magistrate Court Fund (Check Nos. 300244–300245, $96.00); 911 Fund (Check Nos. 4509–4514, $2,384.29); and Parks & Recreation Fund (Check Nos. 1575–1577, $2,139.46).
The meeting was adjourned on a motion by Commissioner Bennett to reconvene on Tuesday, Sept. 16, 2025.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
