Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Dispatch Software topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fire & Rescue committee debates dispatch software, mapping and vendor issues

Culpeper County Public Safety Committee · July 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Chief Monaco and emergency staff described CAD and mapping updates, hydrant-data work with GIS, and ongoing problems with the 1st Due reporting product; county staff said the First Due contract is paused and several agencies favor switching to ESO for reporting and apparatus management.

Chief Monaco, reporting for the Fire & Rescue Association, told the committee the budget-and-finance group reviewed operational expense requests and introduced an updated CIP template. He said communications and CAD problems have prompted work with county GIS to map hydrant locations because hydrant presence alters dispatching rules.

Monaco and Director Oaten discussed the county's experience with 1st Due reporting software. Monaco said the software has performed well for certain career-assignment features but has been "extremely problematic" for EPCR reporting in a volunteer context; Oaten described troubleshooting and vendor nonresponsiveness. Committee members raised the idea of consolidating alerting and reporting under a single county payment to simplify administration, and Monaco said some agencies are interested in ESO because it includes maintenance, inventory and apparatus-record features.

Oaten said the First Due contract is currently on pause pending decisions and that a transition to another product is under active discussion: "The contract is due for renewal, but it is on pause right now, until we get some more definitive answers on what we need to do," he said. Committee members asked to be kept informed about vendor progress and costs and expressed concern about redundant payments across departments.

No formal procurement or contract action was taken at the meeting; members requested continuing updates.