Get email alerts on the Site Plan Design Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Windham Planning Board adds 'Design Review' step to site-plan process
Summary
The Planning Board voted 5-0 on Feb. 18 to amend Section 603.1.1 of the Site Plan Regulations so a preliminary application is treated as a "Design Review" application under RSA 676:4 (II). Town counsel reviewed the change; the board said the preliminary application remains part of the process.
Get email alerts on the Site Plan Design Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Windham Planning Board on Feb. 18 approved amending Section 603.1.1 of its Site Plan Regulations to designate a preliminary application as a Design Review under RSA 676:4 (II).
The adopted language states: "A Preliminary Application shall be considered a 'Design Review' application under RSA 676:4 (II) and shall be governed by its provisions and the provisions herein." Town counsel reviewed the proposed wording, the board said.
Chairman Jacob Cross opened and closed public comment on the change with no members of the public speaking on the item. Payal Ballaya moved to adopt the amendment; Roger Hohenberger seconded, and the board voted 5-0 to approve it.
Board members said the amendment formalizes a step many applicants already expect and preserves the existing preliminary-application stage while adding the statutory Design Review procedures. The board did not adopt additional substantive limits or exceptions for particular project types at this meeting.
The amendment takes effect as part of the Site Plan Regulations; staff and the board indicated they would update application guidance to reflect the change.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
