Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Assessment Results topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Principal presents PSAT/SAT baseline data, calls for targeted math interventions
Summary
A school principal told the Tucker County Board of Education that PSAT results show a strong freshman ELA cohort but disappointing 10th-grade math growth; the principal outlined band-based interventions, intensive enrichment, and plans to tie midterm/final rigor to attendance incentives.
A school principal presented fresh PSAT and SAT baseline data to the Tucker County Board of Education, saying the district’s ninth-grade cohort “beat the the state average in ELA” while 10th-grade math and some growth measures were “my most disappointing group.” The principal framed the PSAT as useful baseline information and cautioned about direct comparisons to statewide or national samples because PSAT participation is often opt-in.
The presenter described how the College Board’s score bands will guide targeted interventions: teachers will identify students’ bands, use the College Board question bank and school-developed intensive enrichment sessions, and prioritize moving students up within bands rather than expecting dramatic jumps. The principal also said the district will recognize students who move bands and will align midterms and finals more closely with standards so students can “earn their way out” of exams only when assessments are sufficiently rigorous.
Board members asked about vertical alignment between middle and high school standards. The principal said that while the PSAT 8/9 and PSAT 10 are not exact apples-to-apples comparisons, trends show some students dip in 10th grade and recover by 11th grade, and recommended middle-school/high-school crosswalks to reduce redundant instruction and better prepare students for higher-grade assessments.
The presentation emphasized small-cohort effects—“we’re so small one or two kids make a huge difference”—and pledged to use the new band reports and targeted enrichment to address math performance and sustain ELA strengths. The board did not take formal action on the presentation; staff were directed to proceed with the interventions and return with updates.
