Get email alerts on the Town Meeting Warning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Selectboard accepts H.433 nonbinding resolution on Warning; declines petitioned equality pledge for ballot
Summary
The Selectboard approved the Town and Police District Warnings, including a nonbinding H.433 resolution on the Warning, and declined to include a petitioned pledge referencing Palestinian rights on the Warning due to concerns it might affect contracts and funding; the board said the latter could be raised from the floor at Town Meeting.
The Selectboard voted to approve the Town Meeting Warning and the Police District Warning on Jan. 26, 2026, incorporating minor language adjustments recommended by VLCT (Vermont League of Cities and Towns) to clarify that the March 3 meeting will be discussion-only for ballot items.
Two petitioned articles were considered for placement on the Warning. The board agreed to include a nonbinding resolution expressing support for H.433, a state-level bill related to health care, on the Warning. A second petition asking voters to request the board adopt a pledge regarding equality that specifically referenced Palestinian rights and stated a non-support position toward the Israeli government was not placed on the Warning. Board members and Town Administrator Gregory Faust expressed concerns that the petition’s language could conflict with existing contracts and future funding opportunities; they noted the petition could still be raised from the floor at Town Meeting.
The board amended the Warning to adjust LOT category minimum percentages to provide flexibility and confirmed tax payment dates. Two petitioned questions were received and handled as noted; the amended motion to approve the Warning passed unanimously.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
