Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Chapter 2 55 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Riverhead staff outline Chapter 2‑55 permitting framework for recurring private events
Summary
Town staff presented a proposed Chapter 2‑55 to create an annual permitting process for 'qualifying recurring private events,' aiming to balance safety and neighborhood protections with agricultural exemptions; the draft includes operational standards, an 8‑event annual cap (12 with waiver) and coordinated department review.
Get email alerts on the Chapter 2 55 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Town staff presented an overview of proposed Chapter 2‑55, a new local code intended to create a predictable permitting process for qualifying recurring private events and to address traffic, parking, noise, lighting and emergency access impacts. The presenter told the Town Board the law is designed to provide "a fair, predictable framework" that applies objective standards so staff can administer reviews consistently.
The presenter emphasized that "This legislation does not regulate farming. I wanna reiterate. It does not regulate farming," and said the draft contains exemptions for ordinary residential gatherings, protected agritourism and certain existing restaurant, catering and bar uses. The proposal would allow one annual application covering recurring events, with an annual general limit of eight events per calendar year and a path for a zoning board waiver to allow up to 12 events in limited circumstances. The presentation also described coordinated review by the fire marshal and other departments for life‑safety, parking and noise mitigation requirements.
Why this matters: Board members said the ordinance would create a single, predictable path for events that currently fall outside the town's public special event process, and staff said the goal is to identify operational impacts before they become neighborhood problems. The presentation noted municipal authority under state ag and markets law (cited in the presentation) while stressing that the draft aims to respect agricultural protections.
Next steps: Staff asked that the draft go back to committees (code revision, agriculture advisory, business advisory) for more detailed review and refinement before returning to the board for legislative action.

