Council reviews five-year CIP; members note missing pier estimate
Ordinance 867 (five-year Capital Improvement Program) was read by title; council members emphasized the CIP is a planning window, not a fixed commitment beyond year one, and noted a cost estimate for the jetty but not for the pier; staff said bids are rough estimates and a budget adjustment would be added when a contract is executed.
The full story
Ordinance 867, the city's five-year Capital Improvement Program, was presented and read by title at the Sept. 10 meeting. Council members reminded the public that the CIP is a rolling five-year planning document and that the city is only committed to the first column (the first-year projects). A council member observed that the jetty had a cost estimate in the CIP while the pier did not and asked whether a rough number should be inserted.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in