Get email alerts on the Remediation Developer Agreement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee discusses remediation responsibilities, excavation and developer agreement changes
Summary
Committee members raised questions about which portions of remediation (labeled A–D) are developer responsibilities and whether the developer agreement needs modification to avoid future excavation and safety liabilities.
Committee members and staff revisited who will handle remediation on specific parcels tied to the RDA site and a developer's responsibilities. One committee member said sections A and B were intended to be Alexander's responsibility while C and D were the city's, and members noted the developer agreement may need modification if assignments change.
A staff participant described a large excavation need and referenced "20,000 cubic yards of film material we need," emphasizing liability and staging concerns. Members flagged safety risks for leaving large pits during staging and asked staff to confirm responsibilities with the developer and Strand, the consultant organizing bid documents.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
