Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Presenter highlights recent ethics code changes and charter review process
Summary
Speakers reviewed the county ethics code (section 22a), the creation of an ethics officer and administrator, and said many charter-review recommendations require state action or voter referenda to change the organizational act.
The presenter discussed revisions to DeKalb's ethics provisions, identifying the ethics code as "section 22a" and noting that the code has evolved and now includes an ethics officer and an ethics administrator created in recent changes. "The ethics code... has evolved over time," the presenter said, adding that the code protects tax dollars and addresses conflicts of interest and the appearance of impropriety.
The presenter also described a county charter review commission that evaluated the organizational act and produced recommendations, thanked a named member ("Miss Hinkle") for that work, and said the CEO and board of commissioners are reviewing those recommendations. The presenter stressed that many proposed changes require action by the Georgia General Assembly and that some provisions, if altered, must be submitted to voters by referendum.
Why it matters: ethics rules and charter changes determine accountability mechanisms for county officials. The session made clear that while local review can recommend changes, certain structural revisions are controlled by the state legislature or a voter referendum, limiting what local officials can unilaterally change.
