Bluffton council asks staff for evidence, mapping and permit clarifications; second reading likely delayed
Following the workshop, council asked staff to compile scientific evidence supporting buffer widths, map wetlands impacts including development agreements, clarify how existing permits are treated, and propose language for exceptions or waivers; staff indicated the pending-ordinance doctrine remains in effect but recommended delaying second reading.
The full story
Council members and staff agreed to additional follow-up before the ordinance returns for a second reading. Staff listed five core follow-up topics: (1) evidentiary support for buffer width (why 50 feet vs. 25 feet), (2) impact on approved plans and federal/state permits, (3) legal risk and current regulatory framework, (4) how buffers operate inside development agreements and PUDs, and (5) how the town can protect wetlands not covered by federal or state jurisdiction.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.