Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rulemaking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rules committee outlines rulemaking process and complex AB 92 updates to protective‑order forms
Summary
Justice Karen Fujisaki and Anne Ronan described the multi‑stage rulemaking process—advisory committees, subcommittees, invitation to comment, legal review—and flagged large consent‑calendar work including AB 92 changes that require cross-committee coordination to add body‑armor surrender provisions to protective‑order forms.
Justice Karen Fujisaki (chair, Rules Committee) and Anne Ronan (Legal Services Office lead staff) presented how the Judicial Council develops and adopts rules and forms: a proposal is drafted (by advisory committees, staff, or the public), vetted by subcommittees and full advisory committees, circulated for public comment, reviewed by legal services, considered by the Rules Committee, and then taken to the full council for adoption.
Fujisaki noted approximately 30 proposals and more than 1,000 pages of supporting materials on the consent calendar for that meeting. Anne Ronan emphasized the scale of the work: Judicial Council maintains roughly 1,500 forms and 1,400 rules, with many forms translated for limited‑English users. She described how AB 92—an amendment expanding prohibitions on possession to include body armor for certain restrained parties—required coordinated amendments to dozens of protective‑order forms because the statute did not specify the logistics for surrendering body armor.
Justice Fujisaki praised volunteers on advisory committees and said the multistage process is designed for transparency and public input. Anne Ronan and Justice Fujisaki encouraged council members and the public to use the invitation‑to‑comment portal to review proposals and submit feedback.
