Commissioners split over siting: county 'Poor Farm' vs. more visible, accessible location
Commissioners debated using county‑owned Poor Farm land—cheaper and expandable—for a jail while placing a downtown or more accessible site for the justice center; tradeoffs include infrastructure costs, visibility, and long‑term value.
The full story
County leaders debated whether to leverage the county‑owned "Poor Farm" property for a jail and locate the justice center at a more visible, accessible site, or to co‑locate both on a single site. One commissioner pressed that a downtown or highly visible location could generate long‑term asset value and easier access for residents, even if it raises upfront infrastructure costs.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in