Board requires independent evaluator member, restricts AD from evaluating own program
Summary
The board adopted conflict-of-interest language preventing an athletic director from evaluating their own program; when a conflict exists the principal or superintendent or an evaluation committee will conduct the review, and the superintendent will develop the rubric for evaluations.
Committee members said the athletic director should normally participate in evaluations but must recuse when there is a conflict such as coaching their own program or having a family member involved. "If the athletic director serves as a coach they shall not evaluate their own program," the Chair said.
In cases of conflict, the board agreed the principal or superintendent or an evaluation committee will conduct the evaluation to ensure fairness. Members emphasized adding an at-large community member to the evaluation panel to increase transparency and reduce bias.
The board asked the superintendent to develop the evaluation criteria and rubric, drawing on job descriptions and additional documentation; that rubric will likely be finalized as an administrative regulation tied to the policy.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
