Alternatives to a May bond: developers propose partial development plus park, community groups offer a supplemental bond
Feb 19, 2025
Developer Icon Construction proposed a compromise that would reserve roughly 3 acres for recreation and develop the rest, while Friends of Oppenlander and other residents pushed for a supplemental bond to meet the school district's price; council asked staff to evaluate proposals and recommended against rushing a May ballot.
The full story
During public comment, the land development acquisition manager for Icon Construction (Harlan Barrow) described a compromise proposal to subdivide the Oppenlander site under existing R10 zoning so the rear ~3 acres would become a park (two ballfields and amenities) and the front acreage would yield middle‑housing lots. He said such an approach could avoid a public bond if the developer built and then conveyed the park improvements to the city, estimating the land and park development at roughly $3.0M for the smaller park plus up to $500K in improvements.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in →