Alternatives to a May bond: developers propose partial development plus park, community groups offer a supplemental bond

Feb 19, 2025

Developer Icon Construction proposed a compromise that would reserve roughly 3 acres for recreation and develop the rest, while Friends of Oppenlander and other residents pushed for a supplemental bond to meet the school district's price; council asked staff to evaluate proposals and recommended against rushing a May ballot.

The full story

During public comment, the land development acquisition manager for Icon Construction (Harlan Barrow) described a compromise proposal to subdivide the Oppenlander site under existing R10 zoning so the rear ~3 acres would become a park (two ballfields and amenities) and the front acreage would yield middle‑housing lots. He said such an approach could avoid a public bond if the developer built and then conveyed the park improvements to the city, estimating the land and park development at roughly $3.0M for the smaller park plus up to $500K in improvements.

Free newsletter

Sign up to keep reading.

Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.

or
Already have an account? Sign in