Get email alerts on the Bylaws topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Open-space set-aside language flagged as ambiguous; commission accepts flood-area wording
Summary
Commissioners identified ambiguous wording in Section 358 H governing 60% open-space set-aside calculations and tasked members to clarify it; the commission separately approved proposed language in Item 81 about flood areas.
Members of the Starksboro Planning Commission determined that Section 358 H (open space) is ambiguously worded about whether the 60% set-aside should be calculated from the initial lot size or only from the area being developed; commissioners agreed to work on clarifying language and revisit it at a future meeting.
Separately, the commission briefly discussed DRB appointment language and voted to accept proposed language in Item 81 regarding flood areas. The motion to accept the flood-area language was moved by Dennis Casey, seconded by Dan Nugent, and passed unanimously.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
