Supervisors split on using settlement funds to buy contractor assets versus county-owned facilities
Board members debated a proposed 40/30/30 allocation (infrastructure/community-based/county-operated) and whether the county should build and own facilities rather than fund contractors to build assets the county does not control.
The full story
The staff proposal suggested allocating 40% of OSF to infrastructure expansion, 30% to community-based organizations and 30% to county-operated remediation efforts. Supervisors said category percentage guidance should remain flexible and discussed whether the county should own assets built with settlement funds.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or
Free account
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in