Long debate over proposed DCCM engineering contract highlights questions about procurement, scope and county capacity
A proposed engineering services agreement with DCCM Infrastructure Inc. prompted an extended court discussion over competitive selection, contract language (liability, caps, agency authority), staff capacity, and the pace of road projects; commissioners split on whether to approve, disapprove or seek an RFQ.
The full story
The court held a protracted and detailed debate on a proposed engineering services contract with DCCM Infrastructure Inc. for project management of county roads. Commissioner Stacy introduced the draft contract and described the contractor role; several commissioners and the county auditor raised procedural and substantive concerns that led to mixed procedural votes and no final approval.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.