Planning commission restores tower-setback language, updates telecom siting rules
In a first reading, staff moved language into the UDO refining where telecommunication facilities may be placed in residential districts, restored monopole setback language suggested by a consultant, and updated application requirements; commissioners approved the amendment on a voice/show-of-hands vote.
The full story
Staff presented a first-reading amendment to the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) covering antennas and towers, saying the update redefines placement rules for telecommunication facilities in residential districts and restores language about monopole tower setbacks suggested by the county consultant. Staff explained application requirements were updated and that some language from the old ordinance was reinserted into the new UDO to reflect current practice.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in