Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public urges Planning Commission to keep solar/battery rules consistent with wind code
Summary
Carol Black urged commissioners to align solar and battery ordinance language with the county's existing wind code to avoid future inconsistencies on items such as decommissioning and viewshed protections.
During the workshop public comment period, Carol Black asked the Planning Commission to ensure the solar and battery ordinance drafting keeps language consistent with the county wind code.
"As the Planning Commission works on creating the solar and battery storage ordinance, please consider if any of the issues that you're discussing that may require amendment to the wind code, that we keep the wind code then consistent," Black said, citing examples including decommissioning provisions and view‑shed language. Chair Brian Davies and staff acknowledged the point and said alignment between codes will be considered as the solar/battery language is drafted.
Staff agreed that small, targeted amendments to the wind code may be appropriate to maintain consistency if drafting the new energy code raises inconsistencies.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
