Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developer seeks county 'no objection' for Linden Ranch workforce housing; court declines to approve
Summary
Developers and the Alamo Area Housing Finance Corporation sought a county resolution of no objection for Linden Ranch, a mixed-income workforce housing project on Loop 337; commissioners questioned the long-term property-tax exemption and a motion to approve the resolution failed for lack of a second.
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Paravel Capital and Alamo Area Housing Finance Corporation representatives presented a proposed mixed-income workforce housing project called Linden Ranch on Loop 337 in New Braunfels and asked the commissioners for a resolution stating the court had no objection to the project moving forward.
Garrison Welch of Paravel Capital described the development and said the project would offer about 160 rent-restricted units earmarked for eligible residents and NBISD employees. Summer Greathouse, counsel for the Alamo Area Housing Finance Corporation (HFC), explained the structure: the HFC would own the project and the developer would receive a property-tax exemption for the period the HFC owns the property. Greathouse emphasized the project is not a low-income housing tax-credit development and said roughly 50% of the units would be market rate and 50% would be rent-restricted for households at or below 80% of area median income; she also said the sponsors had discussed a voluntary $25,000 annual payment to the school district and a structuring fee paid to the HFC at closing.
Commissioners pressed on the mechanics and long-term consequences of a structure that puts project ownership with the HFC, including how long property would remain tax-exempt. Greathouse said statutorily the housing finance corporation's property is tax-exempt while it owns that property and that typical lease terms in similar deals are long (presenters referenced 75-year leases in practice for comparable arrangements). Commissioners discussed whether the court should condition the resolution to require reinvestment of HFC revenues into Comal County programs; Greathouse said representatives from sponsor jurisdictions sit on the HFC board and that the court could seek such conditions.
A motion to adopt a resolution of no objection was made but failed for lack of a second; the item received no formal approval from the court on Aug. 22.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
