Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Climate Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Peekskill climate action plan presented; council to consider resolution in September

Peekskill Common Council · August 5, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Peak Scale/SEAP team presented a Climate Action Plan based on a 2019 municipal GHG inventory (~2,800 metric tons CO2) that maps mitigation strategies across fleet, buildings, commute and waste and estimates the plan can reach near the 2030 target if implemented; council signaled support and asked staff to return with a resolution in September.

A climate action planning team presented Peekskill—s draft Climate Action Plan and told the Common Council the document lays out voluntary, implementable strategies that would reduce municipal greenhouse gas emissions in line with state targets.

A representative from Peak Scale explained the CAP is grounded in a 2019 baseline inventory and focuses on municipal vehicle fleet, buildings and facilities, employee commute and solid waste. The team estimated the city—s municipal emissions at about 2,800 metric tons of CO2 in 2019 and said implementation of the plan—s non-policy strategies would bring the city within roughly 94 metric tons of the 2030 reduction goal.

The presenters emphasized the plan is a mitigation-focused roadmap and that adaptation work (a vulnerability assessment and an adaptation chapter) is still underway. They also said adopting the plan as a resolution would not bind the council to every strategy but would authorize staff and the Climate Action Planning Team to investigate, analyze and recommend specific initiatives, and to pursue funding.

Council members questioned the affordability of major capital strategies without external grants and asked staff to prepare cost estimates, timelines and an implementation prioritization. Several members urged pursuing grants and noted some low-cost actions (for example, a no-idle vehicle policy) could be implemented immediately.

Council agreed to ask staff to bring the plan back for a resolution at the council—s second meeting in September, provide materials for public comment and offer translations for Spanish speakers to maximize community engagement.