Commissioners debate six‑year IGA vs. population split for SPLOST distributions
Board members discussed two options for SPLOST 8: a six‑year intergovernmental agreement that would split funds from day one or a population distribution approach that could delay municipal shares for years; commissioners stressed the deadline for an IGA and asked municipalities for participation.
The full story
Commissioners discussed whether to pursue a six‑year intergovernmental agreement (IGA) so municipalities begin receiving SPLOST distributions immediately, or to use a population distribution method that would allow the county to execute tier‑1 projects first and delay municipal distributions.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or