Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission debates tone, data and 'starter' versus 'workforce' housing in draft plan
Summary
During a long review of the draft housing chapter, commissioners argued for plainer language and for distinguishing 'starter housing' from 'workforce housing'; the chair will add statistics, remove an objectionable sentence, and post a revised draft to SharePoint for further comment.
Members of the Onancock Planning Commission spent significant time reviewing the draft housing chapter, focusing on tone and accuracy. One commissioner criticized the chapter as "academic" and urged plain language so the document is accessible to all residents; another suggested that calling sections "pockmarked" by abandoned homes was unnecessarily negative and proposed softer wording. The chair responded that some facts needed to be stated but agreed to remove one sentence flagged as overly negative and to revise wording for clarity.
Commissioners also debated terminology and data points. The chair said she would add statistics and correct dwelling counts after verification; the draft currently notes 711 dwellings and 680 households, a discrepancy members asked to confirm. They debated whether to use the term "starter housing" or "workforce housing" — one commissioner urged using both terms so the plan will support multiple grant applications and funding streams. The commission directed the chair to incorporate edits, post the revised chapter to SharePoint and compile a full draft for public review by October.
