Get email alerts on the Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves amendment to general plan/zoning contract after questions about scope and invoicing
Summary
On the consent calendar the board approved Amendment No. 5 to the consultant agreement with Minter Harnish to add five study sessions and scope for preparing a revised zoning code draft; staff said the amendment increases the contract by $132,500. Supervisors asked about when in‑house staff could replace consultants and about invoicing tasks; the motion passed on roll call.
The board discussed and approved Amendment No. 5 to the county's community development/planning agreement with the consultant Minter Harnish. Staff said the amendment adds five study sessions and an expanded scope to prepare a formal revised draft of the zoning code, and that the increase in the amendment is $132,500 to cover these additional tasks.
Director Drew Blavani explained the added work "is primarily the result of the items associated with future zoning code that the board wanted to ensure happened based upon the public comment that was received," and said the level of effort was not included in the original contract. Board members asked when county staff would be able to take over this sort of work without a consultant; staff replied that the county currently lacks the planning staff capacity and expertise for this one‑time, multi‑year effort.
Supervisor [mover] moved to approve the consent calendar item and Supervisor [seconder] seconded; a roll‑call vote recorded ayes from the full board and the amendment was approved. Several supervisors asked that staff return with options for phasing consultant involvement and for clearer billing language on project management tasks.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
