Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Cuva Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board adopts policy clarifying discretion for CUVA applications below minimum acreage

Jones County Board of Assessors · August 6, 2026

Summary

Jones County adopted a written policy stating the board will exercise statutory discretion on CUVA applications below the acreage threshold and placing the burden of proof on the applicant; the board approved the policy by voice vote.

The Jones County board adopted a formal policy clarifying how it will exercise discretion on CUVA applications that fall below the statutory minimum acreage. Staff described the policy as a way to put existing discretion "in writing" and said it does not limit statutory authority but sets expectations that the burden of proof falls on the taxpayer.

A staff member explained the reason for the policy: "The reason I felt like we needed a policy on something like this is we've had several taxpayers that have come in and they have less than the required 10. And I just I felt like we needed to put it in writing that it's really at the board's discretion on whether or not you approve it... The burden of proof is on the taxpayer." The chair also clarified that ordinary backyard uses (a deer path or a birdhouse) do not meet the policy's standards for wildlife acreage: "just because you have a deer walk through your backyard in Jones County, that doesn't make it a wildlife area."

Committee member (S2) moved to approve the policy on exercising discretion for CUVA applications and the motion was approved by voice vote. The transcript records the board's approval; no roll-call tallies were included.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source