Get email alerts on the Irrigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee proposes policy language to protect irrigation infrastructure
Summary
Members recommended adding plan language to require adequate setbacks and easements to preserve irrigation infrastructure and access; participants noted an existing 60-foot setback and the canal company's authority to grant exceptions.
A member proposed policy wording obligating developers to provide setbacks and easements so canal companies and water-rights holders retain access to irrigation infrastructure. "If the drains from encroachment by development shall require adequate setbacks and easements to maintain irrigation infrastructure and access," the Chair (S3) said while reading a suggested wording.
Participants noted the county currently uses a 60-foot setback from the edge of canals and that the canal company can, by written permission, allow non-habitable structures closer to the canal. One participant suggested referencing current state statutes (Idaho statutes, Title 42) in plan language so developers must meet applicable state and local laws, rather than relying on committee interpretation.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
