Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Mobile Home Replacement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee supports exploring countywide CDBG mobile‑home replacement program with outside administrator

Steuben County Committee · June 3, 2026

Summary

County staff proposed pursuing a CDBG mobile‑home replacement grant administered by a partner such as Arbor Development; members discussed $100,000 per‑unit caps, income eligibility, contractor limits and potential tax/ownership concerns and gave staff a sense to pursue application preparation.

County staff presented a proposal to apply for a CDBG-funded mobile‑home replacement program and asked the committee whether the county should pursue a countywide application that a partner would administer.

"Only thing if you wanna bring up the, mobile home replacement program," said a staff member introducing the idea. Staff said the funding round typically opens in July with an August due date and that the program commonly provides about "$100,000 per" unit as a funding cap. Staff recommended contracting with a partner (Arbor Development or Millennium) to administer outreach and application processing because the county lacks bandwidth for the program’s administrative load.

Committee members questioned eligibility and program mechanics: staff said assistance is income‑based, applicants must own the property and, in some program versions, recipients must agree to live in the unit for a set period. One committee member asked bluntly, "So you're just giving people a brand new free home?" and was told recipients typically must occupy the property for five years or repay assistance if they leave early; staff also said administrative costs are generally paid from the grant.

Members expressed mixed views about contractor availability and tax consequences of replacing units with newer models; some urged no county administrative cost beyond staff time and recommended using Arbor Development’s outreach capacity. Staff asked for a sense of the committee and, with members indicating support, said they would work with partners to prepare an application and return for formal acceptance when the funding round opens.

Provenance: Staff introduced the program and led detailed discussion across several agenda segments; committee gave staff direction to proceed with application preparations but took no formal vote to accept grant funds at this meeting.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source