Get email alerts on the Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Officials press for more transparency as data‑center deals include NDAs and redactions
Summary
Committee members voiced frustration about non‑disclosure agreements and redactions in public filings; presenters said tariffs and public rate proposals reduce confidentiality and the PSC has questioned many confidentiality requests.
Several committee members and attendees raised concern that important project information is often negotiated under nondisclosure agreements or redacted in PSC filings, making it difficult for local officials and the public to assess impacts early in the process. One member said there has been a "lack of transparency" in data‑center proposals and flagged NDAs and redactions at the PSC as obstacles to early public awareness.
Corey Singletary said the commission has taken a dim view of excessive confidentiality claims in recent cases and that standard tariffs are more transparent than one‑off contracts. "Part of the benefit of having tariffs as opposed to individual contracts is it is very transparent. It's like a posted rate. It's like a menu," he said, noting that tariffs allow public inspection of terms and conditions.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
