Board to interview assessment-engineering proposers after RFP yielded three bids
The district received three qualifying proposals (DTA, ND5, SCI) for assessment-engineering work for a Prop 218 assessment; directors asked staff to run interviews, obtain consistent task-cost breakdowns (tasks 1–4) for apples-to-apples comparison, and defer final selection until funding clarity.
The full story
Board members discussed three proposals for assessment-engineering services presented by staff — DTA, ND5 and SCI — and noted substantial variance in scope and price. The general manager said all three met minimum requirements but offered different task packages and attendance options; directors and members of the public urged asking each firm for a consistent, menu-style breakdown so the board can compare core tasks directly.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in