Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Definitions Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
P&Z trims duplicate definitions, drops archaeological requirement from zoning code
Summary
Commissioners consolidated duplicate language on non‑conforming uses, decided to strike an unnecessary section, debated when survey maps should be required, and agreed to remove archaeological resource requirements from the zoning code citing state law.
The commission spent substantial time cleaning up definitions for non‑conforming uses and lots; members agreed to consolidate duplicate entries and struck a section they found unnecessary. They decided to restructure the code so 'uses' and 'lots' appear under a single heading and to consult the Building Department about whether a one‑year restoration period for reconstruction of non‑conforming structures is reasonable.
Commissioners debated when a survey map prepared by a licensed surveyor should be required, noting surveys can be cost‑prohibitive and that an application for a zoning change alone may not justify a survey. They also reviewed sign‑posting language; Commissioner Hadenfeldt agreed to research code section 10‑9A‑205 concerning sign posting requirements. On archaeological resources, the commission recommended removing the zoning code requirement because state law already governs discovery and reporting of human remains.
