Explainer: transmission adders, credits and the alternative 'ball-and-stick' method in the JTS RFP
Advisers described two competing approaches to valuing transmission impacts in the JTS RFP—Option A's transmission adders and credits and Option B's ball-and-stick methodology—and gave examples of how location affects pricing in the evaluation.
The full story
During the briefing, advisory staff walked commissioners through how the Phase 1 decision proposed to account for transmission impacts when scoring bids and what the alternative methodology would change.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or
Free account
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in