Stakeholders urge SBCC to reissue CR102 after errors and evolving proposals
Trade groups, utilities, contractors and technical reviewers asked the council to withdraw or reissue the CR102 package because many provisions and credit tables were not finalized when the document was published; witnesses cited RCW notice requirements, undisclosed U-factor changes and inconsistent markup that hinder meaningful comment.
The full story
Multiple participants told the State Building Code Council that the CR102 packet posted for this rulemaking was incomplete or changed after notice, preventing meaningful public review.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or