Get email alerts on the Rule 40 Virtual Attendance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Proposed virtual-attendance rule denied in 6–1 roll call
Summary
The committee rejected a proposed amendment to Rule #40 that would have allowed audio/video attendance to count for quorum and stipend purposes; the roll-call vote was 6 Yes, 1 No with Supervisor Sue Hendrickson voting No.
The Executive Committee considered a proposed amendment to Rule #40 to permit attendance by audio and/or video conferencing for quorum and stipend purposes. After discussion, Supervisor Nick Baker moved to deny the proposed amendment; Supervisor Alan Jaques seconded. A roll-call vote was taken and the motion to deny passed 6 Yes, 1 No. Supervisor Sue Hendrickson cast the sole No vote.
The minutes record the explicit roll-call tally but do not record an extended debate; the committee therefore declined to change Rule #40 and the proposed amendment will not be forwarded as presented.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
