Get email alerts on the Right Of Way Widths topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission debates default right-of-way widths and an exhibit to document exceptions
Summary
Commissioners debated whether the ordinance should presume a 33-foot right-of-way instead of 25 feet and whether an attached exhibit listing road-specific widths would resolve inconsistencies for older subdivisions; staff said new roads must meet engineering minimums.
Commissioner S4 argued the draft's 25-foot presumption should be replaced with the township's traditional standard, saying, "the right of way is presumed to be 33 feet wide." Members discussed using an attached exhibit to list specific roads and their established widths so the ordinance would not unintentionally shrink existing rights-of-way created by deeds or recorded plans.
Staff present noted that new subdivisions are subject to current engineering minimums and that in some contexts a 50-foot minimum is used for new roads. The panel agreed the exhibit approach could reconcile historical variances with modern requirements and asked staff to include a map or table as an exhibit for the supervisors to review.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
