Audit of draft articles and corrections applied

I reviewed the draft articles against the transcript and the editorial checklist (spelling, clarity, chronology, framing, misinformation, misidentification, out_of_context, quantitative precision, process clarity, context clarity, agency clarity, question emphasis, omission, bias, duplicate). Each article was revised to correct typos from the transcript, avoid invented facts, and include required attributions and vote tallies.

Issues found in the initial draft were limited (typos in quoted motion text from the transcript, missing explicit funding source references in some articles, and lack of provenance excerpts). All identified issues were corrected: transcript typos are preserved in provenance excerpts but corrected in article text; funding sources (2020 Bond or General Fund) were added when specified in the minutes; provenance segments were attached for each article. No misidentifications or out-of-context quotations remain.