Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board debates class‑3 landfill approvals and seeks clearer rules in land‑development code rewrite
Summary
Board members raised concerns that recent class‑3 landfill approvals might allow future solid‑waste operations without adequate public review. Staff said it will evaluate whether to appeal previous decisions and will include clearer categories (vegetative, C&D, solid waste) in an upcoming land‑development code rewrite.
Board members used the meeting’s board‑comments period to revisit recent approvals for class‑3 landfills and express concern that some orders did not restrict operations to vegetative waste only. Several members said the way approvals were written could allow future owners to seek broader solid‑waste operations. Staff said one of the two recent approvals included a condition limiting the use to vegetative waste while another did not, and that staff will confer on whether to file an appeal or seek clarifying conditions.
The board discussed consequences for roads and bridges (weight limits) if heavy trucks regularly serve new disposal sites, and the risk that approvals running "with the land" could be sold or transferred to operators with different intentions. Staff and the interim growth management director said the county is preparing a land‑development code rewrite and will consider separating facility types (vegetative waste, construction/demolition, solid waste) with different permit paths and conditions.
