Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Setback Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves setback relief for Reed Road shop with 30-foot condition

Scott County Board of Zoning Appeals · August 12, 2026

Summary

The Scott County Board of Zoning Appeals approved a variance to allow a property owner to build a shop closer to Reed Road than the code allows, conditioning approval on a 30-foot setback from the road center to protect easements and utilities.

Chair Gary Fury opened the discussion on Case 26-DA-02, a variance request for a proposed shop on Reed Road. The applicant said he needed to place a 30-by-40 shop off a side street on a corner lot because septic constraints, a steep drop-off and a mature tree line limited buildable area. "Right now, I'm asking for 25 feet from center line, which will give 15 feet from the edge of the road to the front of the shop," the applicant said during his presentation.

Board members and staff reviewed easements and the road cross section, noting utility easements within the county's 50-foot easement and the risk of placing a structure on an easement. Stacy Turner, area plan director, and other members suggested a modest increase to the requested setback to avoid potential conflicts with utilities. After discussion the board moved to approve the variance with the condition that the building be set 30 feet from the road center (effectively adding 5 feet to the applicant's request). A motion to approve with that condition carried by voice vote; the board did not record a roll-call tally at the meeting. Chair Gary Fury advised the applicant to consult staff about next steps and any necessary permits.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source