LISD reviews construction delivery options and begins site studies for elementary bond projects
Parkhill representatives outlined delivery methods (competitive sealed proposals, CM at risk, design-build), staff reported land surveys for Matthews and O. Slaton sites, and staff will seek committee guidance on assigning previously approved A/E firms for bond projects.
The full story
Representatives from Parkhill presented an overview of construction delivery methods to the Finance/Operations & Facilities Committee, describing options including competitive sealed proposals, construction manager at risk (CMAR), construction manager as agent, design-build, and job order contracting. Parkhill outlined trade-offs, noting competitive sealed proposals generally suit straightforward projects and often result in lower costs, while CMAR can provide schedule advantages for complex or phased projects by allowing construction to begin earlier.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in