Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Permanent Standard Time topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Assembly adopts resolution endorsing permanent standard time after extended debate

California State Assembly · August 13, 2026

Summary

The California State Assembly voted to adopt SCR 7, urging Congress to allow permanent standard time, after members debated health research favoring morning light versus concerns about summer evening daylight and Proposition 7’s voter intent. The roll call recorded Ayes 41, Noes 3.

The California State Assembly adopted Senate Concurrent Resolution 7 on July 13, 2026, urging a move to permanent standard time for public-health reasons after an extended floor debate.

Assemblymember Jeff Gonzalez, presenting the resolution on behalf of Senator Nilo, said the measure responds to medical research about circadian rhythms and youth health. "The medical fact the medical fact remains that morning light is best for our health," Gonzalez said, urging colleagues to support the resolution. Supporters pointed to studies linking standard time with improved sleep and reduced heart attacks, strokes and accidents.

Opponents warned the change would cut evening daylight in summer and conflict with prior voter signals. Assemblymember Ward said, "If you vote for this, you are going against Proposition 7 from 2,018, where 60% of the Californians said, yeah, Let's stop moving the clocks," arguing many Californians prefer longer summer evenings. Several lawmakers said federal action will ultimately be required to implement a permanent change.

After debate and multiple procedural steps on the floor, the Assembly recorded a roll-call adoption later in the session: Ayes 41, Noes 3. The resolution expresses the Assembly’s view to Congress and urges consideration of the health evidence cited by supporters. No statutory change was enacted by the resolution itself; it is a formal statement of the Assembly’s position.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source