Get email alerts on the County Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fillmore County Board approves claims, fee reports and surplus items
Summary
On Aug. 11, 2026 the Fillmore County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to approve county claims, accept July fee reports and declare outdated electronics and a printer surplus; payroll and several large vendor payments were included in the claims list.
The Fillmore County Board of Supervisors on Aug. 11 approved the county's presented claims, accepted fee reports for July 2026 and declared outdated electronics and a Road Department printer surplus.
Larry Cerny moved and Wade Sluka seconded the motion to approve the claims as presented; the roll call vote was unanimous (Ayes: Cerny, Graham, Harre, Lightwine, Neiman, Noel, Sluka). The general-fund claims list included vendor payments such as Applied Connective Technologies for $5,076.39, payroll salaries of $61,456.24, and a $50,000 transfer to the Fillmore County Treasurer. Road/Bridge fund items included gravel purchases (Beatrice Sand & Gravel $38,890.61) and payroll of $39,018.69.
County Clerk Amy Nelson presented July fee reports showing County Clerk fees of $19,112.62 (State share $11,597.55; County share $7,515.07), Clerk of the District Court $576.43 and County Sheriff $2,265.25; the board approved the fee reports on a unanimous vote (motion by Mark Lightwine, second by Merle Noel).
The board also declared outdated and unused electronics — listed in the minutes as computers, battery backups and switches — as surplus following a unanimous motion (mover Wade Sluka, second Ralph Graham). The Road Department's printer was likewise declared surplus in a separate unanimous motion.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
