Get email alerts on the Generator Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears second generator variance; questions on placement, screening and testing
Summary
An architect said a contractor misinformed a homeowner about corner setbacks at 104 Osborn Road; the board discussed alternative placements, screening and weekly testing and moved toward approval with standard conditions.
Tom Haines returned to present a second generator variance, this time for 104 Osborn Road, saying the contractor misinformed his clients about required corner setbacks. Haines said the unit had been placed based on the runs of propane and electric and that it is screened from the street.
Board members again questioned why the unit had been installed at the front rather than the rear and discussed weekly testing; several members said the lack of neighbor complaints reduced their concern, and the board proceeded toward a standard approval path similar to the earlier generator item.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
