Get email alerts on the Public Comment Superintendent topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters urge Santa Rosa ISD board to support superintendent during evaluation
Summary
During public comments at the April 14 special meeting, speakers urged the board to base the superintendent evaluation on facts, to consider long-term leadership, and to explain whether they support extending or amending the superintendent's contract.
Two members of the public addressed the Santa Rosa ISD Board during the public-comment portion of the April 14 special meeting, urging trustees to focus on facts and long-term stability in evaluating the superintendent.
Rene Rangel told the board they should evaluate the superintendent "whether good or bad" and asked trustees to state whether they would support him and to explain areas of strength and weakness. Rangel also urged the board to consider whether to extend the superintendent's contract or give a raise and said trustees should "go with your gut instinct" while evaluating the superintendent.
Mike Perez told the board that superintendent work is not easy, that prior superintendents had mixed tenures, and urged trustees to base their evaluation on facts rather than personal feelings. "I hope you do what is right when you do the evaluation for the Superintendent," Perez said, noting the value of long-term leadership for the district.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
