Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Zoning Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Waynesville BZA rejects setback variance for Wayne Court parcel

Waynesville Board of Zoning Appeals · April 29, 2026

Summary

The Waynesville Board of Zoning Appeals voted 6–0 on April 29, 2026, to reject a requested setback variance for parcel #0501328012 after neighbors raised concerns about drainage and property values.

The Waynesville Board of Zoning Appeals on April 29, 2026, voted 6–0 to reject a requested setback variance for a vacant lot on Wayne Court (parcel #0501328012). The applicant, Eric Ross, asked the board to reduce required setbacks for a new build and said he planned to use soil from the site to help address a water problem at the rear of the lot.

Neighbors weighed in. Rear neighbor David Snook said the drainage issue affects both lots and noted his own setback is 42.93 feet. Stacy Almeter, speaking for nearby owner Carol Patteron of 768 Franklin Rd, said that portion of the property has a 20-foot setback and opposed the variance on the grounds it could reduce the neighbor’s property value. Christopher Gremly, whose lot sits beside the empty parcel in the cul-de-sac, said he had no objection.

BZA members reviewed aerial imagery and measured property distances, and they debated which parcel edge should be treated as the 'rear' given the lot's irregular shape. Board discussion also considered whether shifting the house placement could meet existing zoning standards without a variance. After discussion, Roger Butler moved to reject the variance; Judy Prickett seconded. The board recorded six yes votes to reject the variance request and the motion carried.

No further action was taken on the parcel at the meeting; the rejection means the applicant must either redesign the proposed house to meet existing R-2 setback standards or return with a revised application.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source