Commission seeks clarification on probation length for Eye Candy hours request
A commissioner asked whether the applicant Eye Candy had been given a three- or six-month probationary period before seeking a change of hours; staff said they would check and report back the next day, leaving the question unresolved at the meeting.
The full story
During the meeting a commissioner asked whether the applicant Eye Candy had been required to serve a three-month or six-month probationary period before seeking a change to its operating hours. The commissioner said the council was unsure whether the measure had been set at three or six months and asked staff to confirm the earlier decision.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in