Committee discusses 'pillars' and recurring recipients for cannabis funds
Members emphasized creating funding 'pillars' (priority categories), suggested using the ARPA policy as a template, and discussed giving recurring support to organizations like CASA and CAC while leaving other funds for later allocation.
The full story
Members pressed for clearly defined 'pillars'—priority categories that would guide annual allocations from the cannabis fund—and suggested the ARPA policy as a model to borrow guidelines and reporting standards. Member Freeman requested the ARPA policy be included with the cannabis draft so members could see an established template for pillars and allocation criteria.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in