Get email alerts on the ADU topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Proposed ADU rules, 40% R‑1 lot coverage and 8‑foot rear fences would alter R‑1 development
Summary
The April 30 hearing presented a new ADU section for R‑1, raised allowable lot coverage from 30% to 40% in R‑1, and increased rear‑yard fence limits from 6 to 8 feet. Supporters said the changes would make ADUs and mixed uses feasible for property owners.
Get email alerts on the ADU topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The proposed amendments would add a new Section 18.35.070 to allow accessory dwelling units (ADUs) in R‑1 residential zones and change Section 18.35.050E to increase maximum lot coverage in R‑1 from 30% to 40%. The hearing officer explained ADUs must be self‑contained units on the same parcel as the principal dwelling with their own sleeping, sanitation and kitchen facilities.
The packet also proposes raising the maximum rear‑yard fence height in R‑1 from 6 feet to 8 feet (Section 18.35.050G). At the hearing, Joy Banks—who identified herself as owner of Lectra Serv Incorporated—said she supported ADUs and suspected the increased lot coverage was intended to accommodate them. "I take it that's the reason. For the increase in coverage of a lot of residential lots, that is to accommodate these new adus," she said. No written objections were read into the record at the hearing.
If the Council adopts the amendments, the change in lot‑coverage percentages and fence heights will alter the development envelope for single‑family lots in R‑1 neighborhoods; the new rules would take effect only after Council readings and the required post‑adoption review period.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
