Resident warns council surveillance cameras may require warrants under Fourth Amendment
During public comment an anonymous resident warned council that continuous collection of license-plate and location data by fixed cameras can create detailed movement records akin to GPS tracking and cited U.S. Supreme Court cases saying such tracking may require a warrant.
The full story
A public commenter told the City Council that continuous collection and storage of license-plate and location data by fixed surveillance cameras raises Fourth Amendment concerns.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or
Free account
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in