Get email alerts on the Setback And Septic Encroachment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Stroot after‑the‑fact variance continued after board requests survey and structure inventory
Summary
Marc Stroot asked for an after‑the‑fact variance for accessory structures encroaching septic and property lines; the Board continued the hearing to require a survey and full documentation after staff noted setbacks and impervious surface near the limit.
Get email alerts on the Setback And Septic Encroachment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Marc Stroot appeared before the Morrison County Board of Adjustment on July 7 seeking an after‑the‑fact variance for accessory structures encroaching on a septic tank and property lines. Staff entered Sections 706 and 1301.34 of the Morrison County Land Use Control Ordinance, aerial photos, a site plan and site photos into the record; 69 notices were sent to neighboring property owners.
Stroot said two sheds had been removed and one new shed remains that does not meet setbacks; he requested that both sheds be included in the application and provided the board with exhibits regarding impervious surface and runoff to the septic. Stroot also stated the septic had been inspected and reported the lot dimensions (55 by 233 feet) and an impervious surface calculation of 24.8%. Board members expressed concern that the file lacked a full survey and complete structure inventory; on a motion by Clint Kathrein, seconded by George Sandy, the application was continued so all structures could be placed on the record and a survey obtained.
The continuation requires the applicant to submit a recorded survey and full documentation of structures and setbacks before the board will take final action.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
